Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online office interiors retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed September 27, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextEmpty LinksKeyboard Navigation FailureInaccessible Forms

Case Summary

Plaintiff Crystal Redick, a legally blind and visually-impaired individual, has filed a class action lawsuit against an online office interiors retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on September 27, 2021. The plaintiff, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, alleges that the retailer's website is not fully accessible to and independently usable by blind and visually-impaired individuals, constituting a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The complaint details numerous accessibility barriers on the defendant's website, including a lack of alternative text ("alt-text") for graphics and images, empty links with no descriptive text, redundant links leading to the same URL, and linked images also missing alt-text. Further common barriers cited include the absence of title frames for identification and navigation, equivalent text for scripts, forms not providing the same information and functionality as for sighted users, and web pages lacking descriptive titles.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risks faced by online businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and the Unruh Civil Rights Act. Companies operating websites that offer goods and services, particularly those integrated with physical locations, must implement Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1) to avoid similar litigation, potential injunctive relief, and statutory damages.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online office interiors retailer accused of?

The online office interiors retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations including missing alternative text for graphics and images, empty links lacking descriptive text, redundant links, and linked images without alt-text. Other issues include no title frames for navigation, missing equivalent text for scripts, inaccessible forms, and web pages without clear titles.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Crystal Redick, a visually-impaired individual, and is represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal exposure for online businesses, especially those integrating digital and physical services, if their websites are not accessible to users with disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and the Unruh Civil Rights Act can lead to costly class action litigation, demands for injunctive relief to remediate websites, and significant statutory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online office interior.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer