Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Gourmet Candy Retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed September 30, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Focus Indicator FailureInaccessible PDFsEmpty/Redundant Links

Case Summary

Plaintiff Thuy Thanh Alonzo, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on September 30, 2021, against a gourmet candy retailer. The complaint alleges that the defendant operates an e-commerce website that is inaccessible to visually-impaired individuals using screen-reading software, thereby violating their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The complaint details numerous WCAG 2.1 violations, including the lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, missing title frames for navigation, absence of equivalent text when using scripts, and improper functionality of forms. Other alleged barriers include content structure not conveyed visually, text that cannot be resized without functionality loss, enforced time limits without user control, missing web page titles, indeterminable link purposes, keyboard operability issues with a discernible focus indicator, undefined default human language, context changes on focus, lack of labels or instructions for user input, improperly nested markup elements with duplicate attributes, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), and unprogrammatically determined user interface elements.

This action highlights the significant legal exposure for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to disabled users. Companies operating online platforms must proactively adhere to digital accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.1, to mitigate the risk of class action litigation under ADA Title III and similar state laws, emphasizing the critical importance of inclusive digital design and user experience.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this gourmet candy retailer accused of?

The gourmet candy retailer is accused of numerous WCAG 2.1 violations, including missing alt-text for images and non-text elements, lack of title frames for navigation, absence of equivalent text for scripts, inadequate form functionality, keyboard navigation issues due to missing focus indicators, and inaccessible PDFs.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Thuy Thanh Alonzo, represented by the WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal risk for any online business whose website fails to comply with digital accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1, leading to potential class action lawsuits under ADA Title III for denying equal access to visually-impaired users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Gourmet Candy Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer