Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Health and Wellness Retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed October 14, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextEmpty LinksKeyboard Focus Indicator FailureInaccessible Forms and Labels

Case Summary

Plaintiff Portia Mason, represented by Wilshire Law Firm, filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on October 14, 2021, against a health and wellness retailer. The lawsuit alleges that the retailer's website is not fully and equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The complaint details several accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, empty links without descriptive text, redundant links causing repetitive navigation, and linked images missing alt-text. Further allegations include missing page titles, ambiguous link purposes, keyboard focus indicator failures, and inaccessible forms lacking proper labels or instructions. These issues prevent screen-reading software users from independently accessing information and completing purchases.

This action highlights the significant legal risk faced by online businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Similar e-commerce websites and digital service providers operating in California and nationwide could face class action litigation if their online offerings do not comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines and ADA Title III requirements for public accommodations.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this health and wellness retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of violations including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements, empty links, redundant links, linked images missing alt-text, missing page titles, ambiguous link purpose, keyboard focus indicator failure, and inaccessible forms and labels.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff Portia Mason, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed this lawsuit. She is represented by Wilshire Law Firm.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates a legal risk for other online businesses, particularly e-commerce websites, if their platforms are not fully accessible to visually-impaired users. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 AA standards can lead to class action lawsuits, requiring injunctive relief to remediate websites and potential statutory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Health and Wellness Ret.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer