Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online wellness and lifestyle retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed October 25, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Plaintiff Thuy Thanh Alonzo, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on October 25, 2021. The complaint targets an online wellness and lifestyle retailer for alleged digital accessibility failures, asserting violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The lawsuit details numerous accessibility barriers on the retailer's website preventing blind and visually impaired individuals from full and equal access. Key allegations include a lack of alternative text for graphics and images, empty and redundant links, missing title frames, and forms not equally functional for screen-reader users. Further issues involve content structure not conveyed beyond visual presentation, unresizable text, enforced time limits without user control, and web pages lacking descriptive titles or programmatically determined language. The complaint also cites problems with keyboard navigation, UI element identification, and inaccessible Portable Document Formats (PDFs), all contributing to a lack of independent usability for disabled consumers.

This action highlights the significant legal exposure for online businesses operating websites that do not comply with digital accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1. Similar online wellness and lifestyle retailers, and e-commerce platforms in general, face substantial risk of litigation and demands for injunctive relief if their digital services are not independently usable by and equally accessible to visually impaired individuals, potentially leading to costly remediation and statutory damages.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online wellness and lifestyle retailer accused of?

The online wellness and lifestyle retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including a lack of alternative text for images, empty and redundant links, missing title frames, forms not equally functional for screen-reader users, and content structure not conveyed beyond visual presentation. Other issues include unresizable text, enforced time limits without user control, web pages lacking descriptive titles or programmatically determined language, keyboard navigation problems, and inaccessible Portable Document Formats (PDFs).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Thuy Thanh Alonzo and is represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates significant legal risk for online wellness and lifestyle retailers and other e-commerce businesses whose websites are not fully accessible to disabled users. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 standards can lead to similar class action lawsuits, demands for costly injunctive relief to remediate accessibility barriers, and statutory damages under state laws like California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online wellness and li.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer