Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Hospitality Provider

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed October 29, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Focus IndicatorEmpty LinksInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Thuy Thanh Alonzo, represented by Wilshire Law Firm, filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on October 29, 2021, alleging that a hospitality provider's website is not fully and equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The complaint details numerous accessibility barriers, including the lack of alternative text for graphics and images, empty links without descriptive text, redundant links causing navigation issues, linked images missing alt-text, the absence of text equivalents for non-text elements, and title frames without text for identification. Further issues include equivalent text not provided for scripts, forms not equally functional for sighted and visually impaired persons, information conveyed only visually, inability to resize text, time limits without user control, web pages lacking descriptive titles, unclear link purposes, non-discernible keyboard focus indicators, non-programmatically determined human language, context changes on focus, automatic context changes from UI component settings, missing labels or instructions for user input, and markup language errors. Additionally, inaccessible Portable Document Formats (PDFs) and unprogrammatically determined user interface element names and roles were cited as violations.

This case underscores the critical importance for hospitality businesses to ensure their digital platforms comply with web accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.1, to avoid legal challenges. Failure to address these barriers can result in permanent injunctions requiring costly website modifications, statutory damages, and attorney's fees, posing significant legal and financial risks for non-compliant online service providers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this hospitality provider accused of?

The specific violations include a lack of alternative text (alt-text) for images and graphics, empty links without descriptive text, redundant links, missing text equivalents for non-text elements, title frames without text, equivalent text not provided when using scripts, forms not equally accessible to sighted and visually-impaired users, information conveyed only through visual presentation, text that cannot be resized, content with unadjustable time limits, web pages lacking descriptive titles, unclear link purposes, keyboard focus indicators not discernible, default human language not programmatically determined, unintended context changes upon focus or UI component setting changes, missing labels or instructions for user input, markup language errors, inaccessible Portable Document Formats (PDFs), and user interface elements with unprogrammatically determined names and roles.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Thuy Thanh Alonzo filed this lawsuit, represented by Wilshire Law Firm.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates that hospitality providers with inaccessible websites are at risk of ADA Title III and Unruh Civil Rights Act violations, potentially leading to demands for permanent injunctions, significant statutory damages, and attorney's fees to bring their digital platforms into compliance with web accessibility standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Hospitality Provider. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer