Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Paint Company

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed November 3, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt Text on ImagesKeyboard Navigation BarriersInaccessible PDFsScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Meghan Downing, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, has filed a class action lawsuit against a California paint company in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on November 3, 2021. The lawsuit alleges that the defendant's website fails to provide full and equal access to visually impaired individuals, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The complaint details several critical accessibility barriers, including the lack of alternative text (alt-text) for images and graphics, which prevents screen-readers from vocalizing descriptions. Other alleged violations involve issues with keyboard navigation where focus indicators are indiscernible, empty and redundant links whose purpose cannot be programmatically determined, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), and the inability for screen-reading software to determine the name and role of user interface elements.

This legal action underscores the importance of digital accessibility for all businesses operating online, particularly those with integrated physical locations and e-commerce platforms. Businesses in similar industries must ensure their websites adhere to WCAG 2.1 guidelines to avoid potential litigation and ensure equitable access to their goods and services for visually impaired customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online paint retailer accused of?

The online paint retailer is accused of lacking alt-text for images, having inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), issues with keyboard navigation, empty and redundant links, and screen reader incompatibility due to non-programmatically determined user interface elements.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Meghan Downing filed this lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar businesses if their websites are not fully accessible to visually impaired individuals, potentially leading to class action lawsuits under the ADA Title III and state civil rights acts.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Paint Company. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer