Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a Hospitality Provider

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed November 3, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Focus IndicationInaccessible FormsPDF Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Crystal Redick, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a hospitality provider in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on November 3, 2021.

The complaint alleges numerous WCAG violations, including a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, missing title frames for identification, unavailable equivalent text when using scripts, and inaccessible forms. Further issues include text that cannot be resized, content with enforced time limits, web pages lacking descriptive titles, and unclear link purposes. The website also reportedly suffers from indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, undetermined default human language, and components initiating context changes without user advisement. Additional barriers include missing labels for user input, improperly structured markup language elements, inaccessible PDFs, and programmatically undetermined UI element roles, names, and states, as well as empty and redundant links.

This action highlights the significant legal risk for online hospitality providers and similar businesses if their digital platforms fail to meet web accessibility standards, particularly WCAG 2.1 guidelines, exposing them to potential lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Unruh Civil Rights Act for denying equal access to visually impaired users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this hospitality provider accused of?

The hospitality provider is accused of lacking alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, missing title frames for navigation, and not providing equivalent text for scripts. Other issues include inaccessible forms, inability to resize text, enforced time limits, and web pages without descriptive titles. Further allegations include indiscernible keyboard focus indicators, undetermined default human language, and context changes without user advisement.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff Crystal Redick filed this lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal exposure for online hospitality providers and similar businesses that operate websites inaccessible to visually impaired individuals, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III and state civil rights acts for discriminatory denial of services.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a Hospitality Provider. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer