Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a Denim Lifestyle Brand

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed February 3, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1Missing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Plaintiff Crystal Redick has filed a class action lawsuit against an online lifestyle brand in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on February 3, 2022. The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website fails to provide full and equal access to visually impaired individuals, thereby violating their rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

The lawsuit specifically details a range of accessibility barriers encountered by Plaintiff and other visually impaired users. These include a lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, missing title frames for identification and navigation, equivalent text not provided for scripts, and forms lacking functionality for sighted persons. Further issues involve content not conveying meaning beyond visual presentation, inability to resize text without functionality loss, enforced time limits, web pages without descriptive titles, unidentifiable link purposes, lack of discernible keyboard focus indicators, undetermined default human language, and elements in markup languages with incomplete tags, nesting issues, duplicate attributes, or non-unique IDs. Additionally, inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs), empty links, redundant links, and issues with user interface element roles and settings were cited.

This complaint highlights the ongoing legal risks faced by online retailers and service providers if their digital platforms are not designed and maintained to be fully accessible to disabled users. Businesses operating e-commerce websites and integrated physical locations must ensure compliance with accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1 to avoid similar lawsuits, potential injunctive relief, and statutory damages for discriminatory practices against individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?

This online apparel retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations including, but not limited to, lack of alt-text for non-text elements and linked images, missing title frames for navigation, equivalent text not provided for scripts, inaccessible forms, content not conveyed beyond visual presentation, text resizing issues, enforced time limits, missing web page titles, unclear link purposes, lack of keyboard focus indicators, undetermined default human language, and issues with markup language elements.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Crystal Redick, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, filed this lawsuit. She is represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the significant legal risk for online businesses if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III and similar state laws. It highlights the potential for class action lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to remediate accessibility issues, and statutory damages, urging all online service providers to prioritize digital accessibility.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a Denim Lifestyle Brand. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer