Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online Japanese noodle restaurant

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed February 4, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible Forms

Case Summary

Plaintiff Crystal Redick has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online Japanese noodle restaurant in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on February 4, 2022. The plaintiff, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, is visually impaired and alleges that the defendant's website is not fully accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers using screen-reading software.

The complaint details numerous WCAG violations, including a pervasive lack of alternative text for non-text elements and images, causing screen-readers to be unable to vocalize descriptions. Other issues highlighted are empty and redundant links, which introduce confusion for keyboard and screen-reader users, and a user interface that lacks a discernible keyboard focus indicator. The website also allegedly fails to programmatically determine the purpose of links and the default human language of web pages, along with having inaccessible forms, content conveyed solely visually, and various markup language errors. These barriers deny equal access to the defendant's products, services, and physical restaurant information.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risk for any online food service provider or e-commerce website that does not adhere to established web content accessibility guidelines. Businesses offering goods and services online, especially those integrated with physical locations, must ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, or face potential litigation under the ADA and state civil rights acts.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online Japanese noodle restaurant accused of?

The restaurant's website is accused of lacking alternative text for non-text elements and images, having empty and redundant links, missing discernible keyboard focus indicators, and failing to programmatically determine link purposes and the default human language of web pages. Additionally, it features inaccessible forms, content conveyed solely visually, and markup language errors.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Crystal Redick filed this lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for similar online food service providers or any e-commerce website, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to WCAG standards to avoid ADA Title III lawsuits.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online Japanese noodle.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer