Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online skincare retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed April 14, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureEmpty LinksInaccessible PDFs

Case Summary

Plaintiff Portia Mason, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, filed a class action complaint against an online skincare retailer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on April 14, 2022. The plaintiff, a visually impaired and legally blind individual, alleges that the e-commerce website is inaccessible, thereby denying her and other disabled users full and equal enjoyment of the digital platform's goods and services, as well as those offered in conjunction with its physical locations.

The complaint details several alleged WCAG violations, including the lack of alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, empty links without descriptive text, redundant links, and web pages missing titles that describe their topic or purpose. Further barriers cited are issues with keyboard operability where the focus indicator is not discernible, the inability to programmatically determine the default human language of web pages, and the presence of inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs). These deficiencies are alleged to prevent screen-reading software from properly conveying content, leading to discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act.

This lawsuit highlights the significant legal risks faced by companies, particularly e-commerce businesses, whose digital platforms do not adhere to established accessibility guidelines like WCAG 2.1. Failure to provide an equally accessible online experience for visually impaired users can result in class action litigation seeking permanent injunctions to correct access barriers, as well as statutory damages and attorneys' fees, compelling such businesses to prioritize digital inclusion and compliance.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online skincare retailer accused of?

The online skincare retailer is accused of lacking alternative text for non-text elements and linked images, having empty links without descriptive text, redundant links, web pages without descriptive titles, keyboard operability and focus indicator issues, unidentifiable default human language, and inaccessible PDF documents.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Portia Mason filed this lawsuit, represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates legal risk for similar businesses whose websites are not fully and equally accessible to visually impaired consumers, potentially leading to class action complaints under the ADA and state civil rights acts, and demands for injunctive relief and statutory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online skincare retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer