Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fashion and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, C.D. California · Filed September 24, 2025

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, PLC

WCAG 2.1 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Accessible NamesKeyboard AccessibilityDialog Window Interaction Failure

Case Summary

Vivian Salazar has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a fashion and accessories retailer in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on December 28, 2023. This class action alleges that the e-commerce website is not fully accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals using screen-reading software. The plaintiff, a legally blind person, seeks to secure redress for the denial of equal access to online goods and services.

The complaint details several critical accessibility barriers encountered by Plaintiff. These include improperly coded form elements preventing completion of purchases, specifically "I Want It" and "Pick Up In Store" buttons that failed to announce item additions to the cart. Furthermore, dialog windows, such as the "My Bag" and "Pickup Availability" windows, were not announced by screen readers and could not be properly interacted with due to incorrect code positioning, rendering them inoperable for visually impaired users. These coding deficiencies effectively barred the plaintiff from navigating the site and making purchases.

This lawsuit highlights the significant legal risks faced by online retailers whose websites are not compliant with digital accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1. Businesses operating e-commerce platforms and physical stores, whose online presence acts as an extension of their public accommodations, must ensure their digital offerings are independently usable by visually impaired consumers. Failure to address such accessibility barriers can lead to injunctions, statutory damages, and legal costs, emphasizing the necessity of proactive accessibility implementation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this fashion and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having improperly coded form elements and dialog windows that are inaccessible to screen readers. Specifically, "I Want It" and "Pick Up In Store" buttons did not announce actions, and "My Bag" and "Pickup Availability" dialog windows were inoperable due to incorrect code positioning, preventing visually impaired users from completing purchases or interacting with the site.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Vivian Salazar, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, filed this lawsuit. She is represented by WILSHIRE LAW FIRM, PLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal exposure for online businesses that fail to provide accessible websites. Such failures can result in lawsuits under the ADA and Unruh Civil Rights Act, leading to demands for permanent injunctions, statutory damages, and attorneys' fees, compelling businesses to remediate their digital platforms for visually impaired users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fashion and accessories.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer