Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fast Casual Eatery

Case #CAND-16979772 · District Court, N.D. California · Filed March 16, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

Missing Alt TextKeyboard Operability IssuesScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible FormsPDF Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Juan Alcazar, a visually-impaired individual, initiated this legal proceeding on March 16, 2020, through his legal representation, WILSHIRE LAW FIRM. This class action, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges that a fast casual restaurant chain's digital platform is inaccessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, thereby infringing upon their rights to equal access under federal and state disability laws.

The complaint specifies a comprehensive array of accessibility barriers encountered by Mr. Alcazar and other class members on the defendant organization's website. Key issues include the pervasive lack of alternative text for non-text content and images, rendering crucial visual information unintelligible to screen-reading software users. Further compounding these difficulties are inaccessible forms that lack parity with those available to sighted users, an inability to resize text without losing functionality, and the absence of descriptive titles for pages and frames, impeding navigation. The website also exhibits challenges with keyboard operability, programmatically undeterminable human language, and a failure to provide labels or instructions for user input, alongside issues with markup language elements and inaccessible Portable Document Format (PDFs).

This lawsuit emphasizes the critical importance for all businesses offering public accommodations online to ensure their digital services meet rigorous accessibility standards. Entities that provide goods and services via websites or mobile applications risk significant legal repercussions, including permanent injunctions and statutory damages, if their platforms continue to present barriers to individuals with disabilities. Proactive adherence to established accessibility guidelines is paramount for these organizations to foster true digital inclusivity and avert costly litigation.

Case Q&A

What specific accessibility shortcomings were identified on the online platform?

The digital service suffered from multiple issues, including an absence of alternative text for images, undifferentiated links, empty links without explanatory text, and linked images lacking alt-text. It also presented challenges with screen-reader compatibility for forms, text resizing, and navigation elements.

Who is leading this lawsuit and which legal group is supporting them?

The plaintiff, Juan Alcazar, is spearheading this class action. He is being represented by the legal experts at WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What broader implications does this case have for digital service providers?

This case highlights the crucial need for online businesses, particularly those deemed public accommodations, to ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with visual impairments. Non-compliance risks significant legal action, including demands for injunctive relief and statutory damages, under federal and state accessibility laws.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fast Casual Eatery. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer