Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a real estate organization

Case #CAND-60371946 · District Court, N.D. California · Filed September 8, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityLow ContrastInaccessible Form Elements

Case Summary

Andres Gomez, an individual who is visually impaired, has initiated legal proceedings against an online real estate organization operating within the Northern District of California. This action, filed on September 8, 2021, seeks redress under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, asserting that the digital presence of the defendant organization fails to meet federal and state accessibility standards.

The complaint meticulously outlines several critical web content accessibility guideline (WCAG) violations hindering screen reader users. Specifically, it alleges a notable absence of text equivalents for images, rendering visual content inaccessible to screen readers. Furthermore, script and form elements embedded within the website were reportedly not identified with functional text, creating significant navigational barriers. Compounding these issues, the webpage's visual design featured impermissibly low contrast ratios between foreground and background elements, which severely impedes differentiation for users with visual impairments.

This lawsuit underscores the pervasive legal exposure for any enterprise that provides services through a digital platform, emphasizing the imperative for comprehensive ADA compliance. Companies across various sectors must proactively audit and remediate their websites, applications, and online systems to ensure universal usability for all individuals, including those with disabilities. Neglecting to integrate industry-standard accessibility features not only risks litigation but also alienates a substantial demographic of potential customers, highlighting the critical importance of digital inclusivity in today's market.

Case Q&A

What specific accessibility issues were highlighted in the complaint against the real estate website?

The plaintiff encountered several significant barriers, including images lacking text equivalents, script elements and form fields not being identifiable by screen readers, and insufficient color contrast between visual elements on the webpage.

Who filed the lawsuit and what law firm is representing the plaintiff?

The complaint was filed by Andres Gomez, with legal representation provided by the CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS.

What is the broader implication for businesses offering online services, as suggested by this legal action?

This case serves as a clear reminder that businesses operating websites or digital platforms must adhere to accessibility standards like WCAG to prevent discrimination under the ADA and state laws, thereby avoiding potential lawsuits and ensuring equitable access for all users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a real estate organizatio.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer