Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Italian-American restaurant chain

Case #CAND-65594152 · District Court, N.D. California · Filed October 20, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM

Screen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible FormsKeyboard Navigation IssuesMissing Semantic MarkupWCAG 2.1 AA

Case Summary

Christopher Lucero, a visually impaired and legally blind individual, has initiated a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Filed on October 20, 2022, the complaint targets an Oregon-based restaurant operator, asserting that its digital properties, including its official website and mobile application, are inaccessible to disabled users. This action seeks redress under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, claiming that the inaccessibility denies equal access to the company's goods and services.

The complaint details multiple functional barriers encountered by screen-reader users. Allegations include the defendant organization's failure to design, build, and sustain its website and mobile application in a manner that ensures full and equal accessibility. Specifically, the plaintiff found himself unable to complete basic tasks such as placing online orders or logging into the mobile app due to improper coding that prevented interaction with screen-reading software. This systemic lack of proper coding extends to the structure and meaning of content, denying visually impaired patrons the necessary auxiliary aids and services for independent use.

This action underscores the ongoing legal exposure for businesses operating digital platforms that fail to adhere to accessibility standards under ADA Title III and state civil rights acts. Entities offering online services intertwined with physical public accommodations must ensure their websites and mobile applications are fully usable by individuals with disabilities. Failure to implement robust accessibility policies and coding practices risks costly litigation, necessitating comprehensive overhauls to digital infrastructure and potentially leading to significant financial and reputational repercussions for non-compliant enterprises across various sectors.

Case Q&A

What were the primary accessibility failures identified in the restaurant chain's digital platforms?

The lawsuit highlighted significant coding deficiencies on both the website and mobile app, rendering them incompatible with screen-reading software. This prevented the plaintiff from performing essential functions like online ordering and mobile app sign-in, indicating a lack of proper design for visually impaired users.

Who filed this action and which law firm is representing the aggrieved party?

Christopher Lucero, a legally blind individual, is the plaintiff in this class action. He is being represented by the legal professionals at WILSHIRE LAW FIRM.

What broader implications does this case hold for other companies managing online services integrated with physical locations?

This litigation signals a continued imperative for all businesses with integrated online and physical presences to prioritize digital accessibility. Inaccessibility of websites or mobile applications can expose companies to legal challenges under federal and state disability laws, leading to mandates for structural changes and financial penalties.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Italian-American resta.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer