ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Shoe and Accessory Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a federal complaint on January 24, 2020, in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, alleging that an online shoe and accessory retailer's website violates the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title III.
The complaint details several critical WCAG violations, including unlabeled buttons, dropdown options not integrating with screen readers, mislabeled image descriptions, improperly labeled quantity options, and mislabeled color options. It further alleges that the e-commerce website lacks necessary prompting information for visually disabled individuals to complete online forms and that an "accessibility notice" itself was inaccessible, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.
This lawsuit highlights significant legal risks for businesses, especially those in the retail sector, that operate websites not fully compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to similar litigation concerning inaccessible digital platforms and a denial of equal access to services for disabled individuals.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online shoe and accessory retailer accused of?
The online platform is accused of having unlabeled buttons, dropdown options that do not integrate with screen readers, mislabeled descriptions for image content, improperly labeled quantity options, and mislabeled color options. It also lacks features for completing online forms and an accessible accessibility notice.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case demonstrates the legal exposure for businesses whose websites do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to lawsuits for discrimination and denial of equal access for visually disabled users.