Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online restaurant ordering app

Case #FL-16797068 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 3, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AWCAG 2.1 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Form LabelsKeyboard Accessibility

Case Summary

Windy Lucius, a legally blind Florida resident, initiated a federal lawsuit against an online restaurant ordering app in the Southern District of Florida on February 3, 2020. The complaint alleges that the mobile application, integral to a restaurant chain's operations and customer engagement, fails to meet digital accessibility standards mandated by Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). As a user reliant on assistive technology, Ms. Lucius contends the app's design inherently discriminates against visually impaired individuals, preventing equal access to essential services and information.

The plaintiff's grievance outlines several specific failures to comply with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 at both A and AA levels. Critically, the mobile application reportedly suffers from severe screen reader incompatibility, particularly with Apple's VoiceOver software. Users attempting to navigate the app encounter issues such as inaccessible food categories, unlabelled quantity fields and their corresponding buttons, and a non-functional date and time selection button. Furthermore, the complaint points to a phone number input field that incorrectly provides a full keyboard instead of a numeric one, a "unpronounceable" search icon, and status messages, like a successful cart addition, that are not audibly announced to screen reader users, thereby creating significant barriers to independent use.

This legal action underscores a vital risk for businesses operating digital platforms, including mobile applications, in the current regulatory environment. Companies that offer online services promoting or selling products from physical establishments must ensure their digital interfaces are fully accessible to all users, regardless of disability. Failure to proactively integrate robust accessibility features, such as proper screen reader interaction and keyboard navigation, exposes organizations to legal challenges under the ADA, potentially resulting in costly injunctive relief and the imperative to overhaul their digital infrastructure to achieve compliance.

Case Q&A

What specific accessibility issues did the plaintiff encounter with the app's interface?

The plaintiff experienced several challenges, including food categories inaccessible via VoiceOver, unlabelled quantity controls, a non-responsive date/time selection button, an incorrect keypad for phone number input, an unpronounceable search icon, and unannounced cart status messages, all hindering independent navigation.

Who filed the lawsuit and which law firm represents the plaintiff?

Windy Lucius filed the lawsuit, and J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC is representing her in this action.

What broader implications do these alleged violations hold for similar businesses operating digital platforms?

This case highlights the critical necessity for all businesses with digital applications tied to physical accommodations to ensure their platforms are fully accessible under the AD

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online restaurant orde.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer