Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant and Entertainment App Operator

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 7, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 1.3.1 Info and RelationshipsWCAG 3.3.1 Error IdentificationWCAG 3.3.2 Labels or InstructionsWCAG 3.3.3 Error SuggestionScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Windy Lucius, a legally blind plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against a restaurant and entertainment app operator in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on April 7, 2020. The complaint alleges that the defendant's mobile application fails to provide full and equal access to visually impaired individuals under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The lawsuit specifically details several WCAG 2.1 A and AA violations, including issues with "Info and Relationships" (1.3.1) due to unlabeled sign-in/account fields, "Error Identification" (3.3.1) as users are not notified of form errors, "Labels or Instructions" (3.3.2) where expandable section buttons lack focus and announcements, and "Error Suggestion" (3.3.3) because no suggestions are provided when planning form questions are left blank. These barriers prevent effective use with screen reader software like VoiceOver.

This action highlights the significant legal exposure for mobile application operators whose digital platforms do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Businesses offering apps that serve as a nexus to public accommodations face potential lawsuits, court-ordered injunctions requiring costly modifications, and payment of the plaintiff's legal fees if their applications are not made fully accessible to users with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant and entertainment app operator accused of?

The app operator is accused of WCAG 1.3.1 (unlabeled fields), WCAG 3.3.1 (failure to identify errors), WCAG 3.3.2 (missing labels or instructions for expandable sections), and WCAG 3.3.3 (no error suggestions).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates that mobile application operators face significant legal risk under ADA Title III if their apps are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to court-ordered modifications and legal fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Restaurant and Entertainm.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer