ADA Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuit: a food ordering app
Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC
Case Summary
Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed a lawsuit against an online food ordering app in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on May 4, 2020. This action alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, citing the inaccessibility of the mobile application for blind and visually impaired users who rely on screen reader software.
The complaint details several WCAG violations, including unlabeled icons for essential functions like account access and location pins (WCAG 1.1.1 Non-Text Content). It also highlights issues where interactive elements, such as "+" buttons to add items to the cart, are unannounced or "unpronounceable," hindering users from making purchases (WCAG 1.3.1 Info and Relationships). Further deficiencies include improper focus order that skips content on loyalty pages (WCAG 2.4.3 Focus Order), unlabeled date and time fields crucial for delivery orders (WCAG 2.5.3 Label in Name), and unannounced pop-ups for error identification or address confirmation (WCAG 3.3.1 Error Identification), which prevent users from completing orders.
This case underscores the significant legal risks faced by businesses operating digital platforms, such as mobile applications, if they do not ensure full accessibility for disabled users. Companies in the food and beverage industry offering ordering or service apps must proactively address WCAG guidelines to avoid similar lawsuits, emphasizing the need for comprehensive digital accessibility to ensure equal access to goods and services for all consumers.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this food ordering app accused of?
The food ordering app is accused of several WCAG violations, including unlabeled icons (WCAG 1.1.1 Non-Text Content), unannounced interactive elements such as "+" buttons to add items (WCAG 1.3.1 Info and Relationships), improper focus order (WCAG 2.4.3 Focus Order), unlabeled form fields for date and time (WCAG 2.5.3 Label in Name), and lack of error identification for pop-ups (WCAG 3.3.1 Error Identification).
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.
What legal risk does this create?
This case demonstrates the legal risk for companies offering digital platforms, such as mobile applications, that fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG accessibility standards. It emphasizes that such businesses may face lawsuits for discrimination if their apps are not independently usable by individuals with disabilities, leading to potential injunctive relief, costs of suit, and attorneys' fees.