ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online rental properties provider
Plaintiff's Firm: THE ROSS LAW GROUP PLLC
Case Summary
ISSAC ABDINOOR has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Palm Beach County Division, on May 15, 2020, against an online rental properties provider for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III.
The complaint alleges numerous access barriers on the defendant's website, making it inaccessible to visually impaired users who rely on screen reader software. Specific violations include graphics, links, headings, functions, forms, and text not fully compatible with screen readers, the absence of an ADA button or link to adjust the website format or font, skipped heading level errors, a pervasive lack of alternative text ('alt-text') or uninformative alt-text for images, and missing document language.
This action highlights the ongoing legal risk for other online rental properties providers and similar e-commerce platforms that fail to implement accessible website design, potentially leading to lawsuits under the ADA Title III for discriminatory digital experiences.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online rental properties provider accused of?
The provider is accused of having website elements (graphics, links, headings, forms, text) incompatible with screen readers, lacking an ADA accessibility button, exhibiting skipped heading level errors, featuring missing or uninformative alt-text for images, and failing to specify document language.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
ISSAC ABDINOOR filed this lawsuit, represented by THE ROSS LAW GROUP PLLC.
What legal risk does this create?
This lawsuit demonstrates the legal vulnerability of online rental properties providers and other digital businesses that do not ensure their websites comply with ADA Title III accessibility standards, risking similar litigation for digital discrimination.