Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Handbag and Luggage Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 8, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 A F65WCAG 2.0 A F89WCAG 2.0 A F86WCAG 2.0 H71Screen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 8, 2020. The complaint alleges that an online handbag and luggage retailer's website fails to provide full and equal access to visually impaired individuals, constituting a violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Mahlberg, who is legally blind and uses screen-reading software, claims he was unable to effectively navigate and utilize the website's services.

The lawsuit specifically details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations, including image elements missing alt attributes (WCAG 2.0 A F65), anchor elements lacking text or alt attributes for embedded images (WCAG 2.0 A F89), input fields in groups missing labels (WCAG 2.0 A F86), fieldset elements lacking legend elements (WCAG 2.0 H71), and button elements with images missing alt attributes (WCAG 2.0 A F65). Additionally, link elements reportedly lack accessible names (WCAG 2.0 A F65), and alt text contains placeholder words (WCAG 2.0 A F30), contributing to a general screen-reader incompatibility and lack of Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA) implementation.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce platforms that are not fully accessible to disabled users. The complaint seeks a permanent injunction to mandate that the defendant's website be made accessible, along with an award for attorney's fees, costs, and litigation expenses. Businesses, particularly online retailers, are encouraged to proactively review their digital platforms against WCAG standards to mitigate similar ADA Title III litigation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online handbag and luggage retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including images missing alt attributes (F65), anchor elements lacking text or alt attributes (F89), input fields missing labels (F86), fieldset elements missing legend elements (H71), and placeholder text in alt attributes (F30).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates a legal risk for other online retailers whose websites may not be fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to injunctions, attorney's fees, and litigation costs under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Handbag and Lug.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer