Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a food service mobile app

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 12, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

Screen Reader IncompatibilityMissing or Incorrect LabelsKeyboard Navigation FailureWCAG 1.3.2 Meaningful SequenceWCAG 4.1.3 Status Messages

Case Summary

Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a mobile application for a food service business in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on June 12, 2020. The plaintiff, who is legally blind, alleges that the mobile application is not fully accessible or independently usable by visually impaired consumers, thereby violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint specifically details multiple Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations, including issues with WCAG 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence, such as an inability to add items from pop-up menus and improperly labeled quantity fields for screen reader users. Violations of WCAG 2.4.3 Focus Order prevented the Menu icon from being accessible via swiping. WCAG 3.2.2 On Input violations made quantity changes impossible with VoiceOver, and WCAG 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value issues blocked the checkout process. Additionally, the mobile application failed WCAG 2.4.6 Headings and Labels, WCAG 2.4.7 Focus Visible, and WCAG 4.1.3 Status Messages by having identical labels for different buttons, requiring excessive navigation for main menu access, and not announcing status messages to screen reader users.

This lawsuit highlights significant legal risks for businesses operating similar online food ordering platforms or mobile applications. The allegations demonstrate that failure to integrate assistive technology properly and adhere to WCAG standards can lead to accusations of discrimination under the ADA, potentially resulting in injunctive relief, requiring costly modifications, and legal fees. All digital service providers are reminded of the critical need for comprehensive accessibility audits and remediation to ensure full and equal access for all users, including those with visual impairments.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this food service mobile app accused of?

The food service mobile app is accused of violating WCAG 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) regarding ordering items and focus, WCAG 2.4.3 (Focus Order) by skipping the menu icon, WCAG 3.2.2 (On Input) by preventing quantity changes with VoiceOver, and WCAG 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) which hindered the checkout process. Additionally, it failed WCAG 2.4.6 (Headings and Labels) due to incorrect button labels, WCAG 2.4.7 (Focus Visible) requiring extensive navigation, and WCAG 4.1.3 (Status Messages) as confirmation messages were not announced.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Windy Lucius, represented by the law firm J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal risk for digital platforms and mobile applications in the food service industry regarding ADA Title III compliance. Companies face potential lawsuits if their apps are not fully accessible to users with disabilities, particularly those relying on screen readers, leading to demands for injunctive relief, mandatory accessibility modifications, and payment of legal costs and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a food service mobile app. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer