ADA App Accessibility Lawsuit: a mobile food ordering platform
Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC
Case Summary
Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed a lawsuit against a mobile food ordering platform in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 6, 2020. The complaint alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) due to the inaccessibility of the platform's mobile application for blind and visually impaired users, who rely on assistive technologies like screen reader software.
The complaint details several specific WCAG 2.1 A and AA violations. These include unlabeled quantity adjustment buttons (WCAG 1.3.1 - Info and Relationships), an inability for screen reader users to return to the app after attempting to access account information due to an unlabeled back button (WCAG 1.3.2 – Meaningful Sequence), and an illogical focus order during the registration process where users must swipe backwards to locate the 'Next' button (WCAG 2.4.3 – Focus Order). Further issues include unlabeled Quantity fields (WCAG 3.3.2 – Labels or Instructions), inaccessible Terms & Conditions that cannot be read before account creation (WCAG 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value), and unlabeled Account, Search, and Cart icons (WCAG 2.4.6 – Headings and Labels).
This case underscores the critical importance for businesses operating mobile applications that serve as public accommodations to ensure full accessibility for individuals with disabilities. Failure to design and program apps to properly integrate with assistive technologies, such as screen readers, creates a significant legal risk for discrimination lawsuits under ADA Title III, potentially leading to costly injunctive relief, court-mandated policy modifications, and attorneys' fees for non-compliant digital platforms.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this mobile food ordering platform accused of?
The platform is accused of WCAG 1.3.1 (unlabeled quantity adjustment buttons), 1.3.2 (inability to return from account info due to unlabeled back button), 2.4.3 (illogical focus order during registration), 3.3.2 (unlabeled quantity fields), 4.1.2 (inaccessible Terms & Conditions before account creation), and 2.4.6 (unlabeled Account, Search, and Cart icons).
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
This lawsuit was filed by Windy Lucius, represented by J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.
What legal risk does this create?
This creates a legal risk for mobile app operators, particularly those functioning as public accommodations, of lawsuits alleging discrimination under ADA Title III if their applications are not fully accessible to disabled individuals, which can result in injunctive relief, mandatory policy changes, and legal costs.