ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online footwear retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: Acacia Barros, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, a visually-impaired and legally blind person, represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on August 19, 2020, against an online footwear retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's website is not fully or equally accessible to blind or visually impaired consumers, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including digital source code barriers that prevent screen readers from working, empty headings and text fields causing navigation confusion for users relying on the TAB key, and missing accessible names for image elements (WCAG 2.0 F65). Further alleged issues include unlabeled fieldset elements (WCAG 2.0 H71), visual labels not appearing in accessible names for links and controls (WCAG 2.0 A F96), duplicate IDs on elements (WCAG 2.0 A 4.1.1), and content inserted with CSS not being readable by some screen readers (WCAG 2.0 F87). The e-commerce website also fails to consider Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA) software language and Universal Design principles.
This legal action highlights the ongoing necessity for digital platforms to adhere to accessibility standards to avoid discrimination claims. Businesses operating e-commerce websites, particularly those with a physical presence, face significant legal exposure if their online offerings are not fully navigable and usable by individuals with disabilities, especially those who rely on assistive technologies like screen readers. Failure to integrate appropriate auxiliary aids and services can lead to injunctions, requiring substantial website modifications and potentially incurring attorney's fees and litigation costs.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online footwear retailer accused of?
The online footwear retailer is accused of multiple WCAG violations, including digital source code barriers impacting screen readers, empty headings and text fields causing navigation confusion, missing accessible names for image elements (WCAG 2.0 F65), unlabeled fieldset elements (WCAG 2.0 H71), visual labels not appearing in accessible names for links and controls (WCAG 2.0 A F96), duplicate IDs on elements (WCAG 2.0 A 4.1.1), and content inserted with CSS not being readable by some screen readers (WCAG 2.0 F87). The website also lacks consideration for ARIA and Universal Design principles.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Raymond T. Mahlberg, a visually-impaired and legally blind individual, filed this lawsuit. He is represented by the law firm Acacia Barros, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This lawsuit creates a legal risk for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with disabilities, particularly those using screen readers. Such businesses risk facing injunctions, demands for website modifications, and liability for attorney's fees and costs under ADA Title III for denying equal access to their online services and products.