Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fashion brand

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 26, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 F89Keyboard Navigation OrderMissing Accessible Names for ImagesAmbiguous Link TextDuplicate IDs

Case Summary

Plaintiff, RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG, has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online fashion retailer in the Southern District of Florida on August 26, 2020. The complaint, brought by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, thereby violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit specifically details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations. These include `a` elements lacking text or alt attributes (WCAG 2.0 F89), tab order not following logical sequences (WCAG 2.0 F44), `img` elements missing accessible names (WCAG 2.0 A F65), links using generic text like 'Click Here' without explanatory context (WCAG 2.0 F63), and duplicate IDs used on multiple elements (WCAG 2.0 A 4.1.1).

This legal action highlights the ongoing challenge for businesses operating e-commerce platforms to ensure their digital offerings are fully accessible to all users. Businesses in the retail sector, particularly those with a significant online presence, face substantial legal risk under the ADA if their websites are not designed and maintained in compliance with established accessibility standards like WCAG.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The online fashion retailer is accused of several WCAG violations, including `a` elements lacking text or alt attributes, tab order not following logical sequences, `img` elements missing accessible names, links using generic text like 'Click Here' without explanatory context, and duplicate IDs on multiple elements.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG, and the plaintiff is represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for businesses, especially those in e-commerce, that fail to ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with disabilities. It underscores the potential for lawsuits under ADA Title III if digital platforms do not comply with accessibility standards, leading to demands for injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fashion brand. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer