ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a golf entertainment venue operator
Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., filed a lawsuit on September 9, 2020, in the Southern District of Florida. The complaint targets a golf entertainment venue operator for alleged violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, stemming from an inaccessible website and mobile application for visually impaired users. The plaintiff seeks permanent injunctive relief and damages.
The complaint identifies several specific WCAG 2.0 violations, including missing alt attributes for 'a' elements (WCAG 2.0 F89), duplicate IDs on elements (WCAG 2.0 A411), lack of keyboard accessibility for clickable controls (WCAG 2.0 A F15), blank label elements (WCAG 2.0 A 4.12), and HTML form controls lacking accessible names (WCAG 2.0 F68). These digital barriers allegedly prevent full and equal access to the services and information offered by the online platform.
This case underscores the legal imperative for businesses to ensure their digital platforms, including websites and mobile applications, are fully accessible under ADA Title III. Failure to comply with established accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG, exposes companies to litigation, demands for injunctive relief, and potential financial penalties, emphasizing the need for proactive digital accessibility remediation.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this golf entertainment venue operator accused of?
The lawsuit alleges WCAG 2.0 violations including missing alt text for 'a' elements (F89), duplicate element IDs (A411), lack of keyboard accessibility for clickable controls (F15), blank label elements (A 4.12), and HTML form controls without accessible names (F68).
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm Acacia Barros, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case signifies a legal risk for businesses whose websites and mobile applications are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief, and substantial legal fees for non-compliance with ADA Title III.