Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an app offering massage services

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 11, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AScreen Reader IncompatibilityWCAG 4.1.2 Name Role ValueInaccessible Booking ProcessADA Title III Mobile App

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on September 11, 2020, alleging that an app offering massage services violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III. The complaint, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC, asserts that the mobile application fails to provide full and equal access for visually impaired users.

The complaint specifically highlights several accessibility barriers, stating that the app does not properly integrate with screen reader software like VoiceOver, denying visually impaired users independent access. It is alleged that the app fails to meet WCAG 2.1 A level accessibility, with a critical violation of WCAG guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value). This particular issue prevents VoiceOver users from hearing or selecting subservices required to complete the first step of the booking process, effectively making key functionalities inaccessible.

This case underscores the significant legal risks faced by businesses that offer digital services, such as mobile applications, without ensuring they are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies in the health and wellness industry, particularly those using apps for bookings and services, should be aware that non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to similar lawsuits, potential injunctions requiring costly modifications, and payment of attorneys' fees and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this app offering massage services accused of?

The app is accused of not properly integrating with screen reader software (VoiceOver), failing to meet WCAG 2.1 A level accessibility, and specifically violating WCAG guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value), which prevents visually impaired users from selecting services in the booking process.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses operating mobile applications that are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III, requirements for injunctive relief to modify the app, and financial penalties including attorneys' fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an app offering massage s.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer