Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Fashion Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 28, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

Missing Alt Text (WCAG 2.0 F89)Inaccessible Form Fields (WCAG 2.0 F86)Duplicate Element IDs (WCAG 2.1 A 4.1)Keyboard Navigation Failure (WCAG 2.0 F15)ARIA and Universal Design Neglect

Case Summary

Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on September 28, 2020, against an online fashion retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals, preventing them from accessing goods and services.

The lawsuit specifically details several WCAG violations, including missing alt-text for and elements (WCAG 2.0 F89), lack of accessible names for input fields (WCAG 2.0 F86) and HTML form controls (WCAG 2.0 F89), duplicate IDs on elements (WCAG 2.1 A 4.1), and inaccessible clickable controls for keyboard users (WCAG 2.0 F15). It further states the website contains empty headings and text fields that cause confusion and is not designed with ARIA or Universal Design principles.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to adhere to established accessibility standards. Organizations with digital platforms must ensure their websites provide effective communication and equal access to all users, including those with visual impairments who rely on screen-reading software, to avoid similar litigation and ensure compliance with ADA Title III regulations.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The online fashion retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including missing alt-text for <a> and <img> elements (WCAG 2.0 F89), lack of accessible names for input fields and HTML form controls (WCAG 2.0 F89), duplicate IDs on elements (WCAG 2.1 A 4.1), and inaccessible clickable controls for keyboard users (WCAG 2.0 F15).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg, a visually-impaired individual, filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal risk for businesses with e-commerce websites that are not accessible to users with disabilities, particularly those who rely on screen-reading software. Failure to implement appropriate auxiliary aids and services in website design can lead to ADA Title III lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Fashion Retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer