Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online eyewear retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 29, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: The Leal Law Firm, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextContent Structure IssuesIncorrect Reading SequenceMissing Page Titles

Case Summary

ANDRES GOMEZ has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on September 29, 2020, against an online eyewear retailer. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website contains digital barriers preventing blind and visually impaired consumers from full and equal access under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The lawsuit specifically claims that the website fails to provide text equivalents for non-text elements, does not convey information about content meaning and structure programmatically, exhibits an incorrect reading sequence for content, lacks descriptive page titles, and does not explain images to screen reader users. These deficiencies allegedly prevent the plaintiff from accessing crucial information such as store locations, hours, product descriptions, and special promotions.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating websites that do not comply with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0 AA). Companies across various industries, particularly those with integrated online and physical presences, face potential lawsuits if their digital platforms are not independently usable by individuals with disabilities, necessitating proactive accessibility measures.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online eyewear retailer accused of?

The online eyewear retailer is accused of not providing text equivalents for non-text elements, failing to convey content meaning and structure programmatically, having an incorrect reading sequence, lacking descriptive page titles, and not explaining images to screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by ANDRES GOMEZ, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other businesses, especially those with integrated online and physical services, that their websites may violate ADA Title III if they are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, particularly regarding WCAG 2.0 AA compliance.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online eyewear retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer