Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 4, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 F65WCAG 2.0 F71WCAG 2.0 A 4.12WCAG 2.0 A 1.3.1ADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Aishia Petersen has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Palm Beach Division, on October 4, 2020, against an online clothing retailer. The plaintiff, who is legally blind, alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers using screen-reading software.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.0 violations, including missing accessible names for image (`img`) elements (WCAG 2.0 F65) and area elements (WCAG 2.0 F65), fieldset elements lacking legend labels (WCAG 2.0 F71), blank label elements (WCAG 2.0 A 4.12), and `aria-hidden` elements containing focusable content (WCAG 2.0 A 1.3.1). These barriers reportedly prevent effective use of screen-reading software, denying the plaintiff full and equal access to the digital platform's content and services.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for online retailers and other public accommodations whose websites are not compliant with ADA Title III and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Businesses operating e-commerce platforms must ensure their digital presence is fully accessible to individuals with disabilities to avoid similar litigation, potential injunctive relief, and awards for attorney's fees and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing retailer accused of?

Missing accessible names for image (`img`) elements (WCAG 2.0 F65) and area elements (WCAG 2.0 A F65), fieldset elements lacking legend labels (WCAG 2.0 F71), blank label elements (WCAG 2.0 A 4.12), and `aria-hidden` elements containing focusable content (WCAG 2.0 A 1.3.1).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Aishia Petersen, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the ongoing legal exposure for online businesses that fail to provide accessible websites under ADA Title III, potentially leading to injunctive orders, attorney's fees, and court costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer