Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Shoe Retailer's Mobile App

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 22, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

Missing Accessible Names/LabelsScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureLow ContrastSmall Touch Targets

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen, a legally blind individual, has filed a lawsuit against a prominent shoe retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on October 22, 2020. This action alleges that the retailer's mobile application is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint details numerous digital accessibility barriers within the mobile app, preventing effective use by screen-reader software. These alleged violations include missing or duplicate descriptions for multiple items, insufficient zoom functionality, small touch targets, poor contrast, and undescribed interactive elements such as the "Enable Location" button and login page fields (email, password, first and last name). Furthermore, the app is accused of failing to meet WCAG 2.1 A accessibility standards, lacking keyboard-only navigation, and not providing announced or focused error messages on form submissions, with buttons also lacking proper roles for screen readers like Voiceover.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating mobile applications that do not integrate robust accessibility features. Such non-compliance can lead to federal lawsuits under the ADA, compelling businesses to incur significant costs for remediation, legal fees, and potential damages, underscoring the critical need for all digital platforms to be equally accessible to individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this shoe retailer's mobile app accused of?

The mobile app is accused of having multiple items with no description or the same description, items requiring larger zoom, small touch targets, poor contrast, and undescribed buttons like "Enable Location." Additionally, login page fields (email, password, first name, last name) lack label descriptions, error messages after form submission are not announced or keyboard-focused, and buttons are inaccessible to Voiceover, failing to meet WCAG 2.1 A level.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Aishia Petersen, a legally blind individual, and she is represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for businesses that offer mobile applications, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III if their apps are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, necessitating costly injunctive relief, policy changes, and legal fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Shoe Retailer's Mobile Ap.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer