Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Mobile Application Provider

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 27, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: The Leal Law Firm, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 GuidelinesMissing Alt Text on ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Page TitlesMissing Accessibility Statement

Case Summary

Plaintiff Andres Gomez, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on October 27, 2020. The complaint alleges that the defendant, a mobile application provider, violated Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) because its mobile application is not fully accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.

The lawsuit specifies several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations within the mobile application. These include the absence of text equivalents for non-text elements, content meaning conveyed solely through visual presentation, an incorrect reading sequence for programmatic determination, app pages lacking descriptive titles, images not being explained to screen reader users, and a complete absence of an Accessibility Statement detailing company policy for disabled users.

This case underscores the significant legal exposure for businesses offering digital platforms, such as mobile applications, that fail to adhere to ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Entities must ensure their digital services are equally accessible to individuals with disabilities to mitigate the risk of litigation and comply with federal accessibility mandates.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this mobile application provider accused of?

The mobile application is accused of lacking text equivalents for non-text elements, conveying content meaning solely through visual presentation, having an incorrect reading sequence, missing descriptive page titles, failing to explain images to screen readers, and not providing an Accessibility Statement.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Andres Gomez filed this lawsuit, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for mobile application providers who may face lawsuits under ADA Title III if their apps are not fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Mobile Application Provid.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer