Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a mobile app provider

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 28, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

Screen Reader Incompatibility (VoiceOver)Missing Alt Text on Product ImagesKeyboard Navigation FailureInsufficient Color ContrastMissing Accessible Labels (Form Fields)

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on October 28, 2020, against an online furniture and houseware retailer. The complaint alleges that the mobile application provided by the defendant is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The lawsuit details several specific accessibility barriers present in the mobile application. These include unavailable product image descriptions, duplicate description IDs for multiple items, lack of a zoom feature for items that should be larger, small touch target sizes, poor color contrast, and missing descriptions for email and password fields on the 'sign in' page. Furthermore, the application is alleged to fail WCAG 2.1 A level of accessibility, lacking keyboard-only navigation, failing to announce or give keyboard focus to error messages in forms, and having buttons without proper roles, rendering them inaccessible to screen-readers like VoiceOver.

This legal action highlights the critical importance for all businesses offering digital platforms, particularly those linked to physical places of public accommodation, to ensure their mobile applications comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines. Failure to provide auxiliary aids and services, such as screen-reader compatibility, can lead to injunctions, substantial legal costs, and attorney's fees, compelling changes to policies and digital infrastructure to ensure equal access for individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this mobile app provider accused of?

The mobile app is accused of lacking product image descriptions, having duplicate description IDs, insufficient zoom, small touch targets, poor color contrast, missing form field labels, failure in keyboard-only navigation, inadequate form error handling for screen readers, and incorrect button roles leading to VoiceOver incompatibility.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Aishia Petersen filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk of injunctions, attorney's fees, and costs for similar businesses if their mobile applications fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG accessibility standards, forcing them to implement significant digital accessibility modifications.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a mobile app provider. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer