ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online shoe and apparel retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff Aishia Petersen, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit against an online shoe and apparel retailer in the Southern District of Florida on November 30, 2020. The complaint alleges that the retailer's mobile application is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The plaintiff, who is legally blind, relies on screen-reading technology like iPhone's "Voiceover" to access digital content.
The lawsuit specifically identifies multiple digital barriers. These include banners with audio described as "zero underscore zero" instead of actual content like "40% off with code:cyber," product items lacking descriptions or having identical descriptions, insufficient zoom for items, small touch targets, poor contrast, and button roles not accessible to screen readers. Furthermore, the mobile app allegedly fails to announce error messages or "Add to bag" confirmations, and quantity adjustments are labeled with "hyphen" instead of a numerical decrease, rendering the application substantially inaccessible and failing to meet WCAG 2.1 A level accessibility.
This case highlights the significant legal risks faced by businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms, such as mobile applications, are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies operating e-commerce mobile apps must comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 A guidelines to avoid lawsuits, potential injunctive relief, and the associated costs, including attorneys' fees and expert fees, for failing to provide effective communication and equal enjoyment of goods and services.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online shoe and apparel retailer accused of?
The mobile application is accused of having banners with incorrect screen reader audio ("zero underscore zero"), missing or identical product descriptions, insufficient zoom for items, small touch targets, poor contrast, inaccessible button roles, failure to announce error messages or "Add to bag" confirmations, and incorrect audio for quantity adjustments ("hyphen").
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
The lawsuit was filed by Aishia Petersen, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This creates a significant legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce mobile applications that are not accessible to visually impaired users, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III, permanent injunctions, and substantial legal costs including attorney and expert fees.