Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fast-food chain's mobile app

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 15, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Accessible NamesSmall Touch TargetsError Identification

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a fast-food chain operating a mobile e-commerce application in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on December 15, 2020, alleging that its digital platform is inaccessible to visually impaired users.

The complaint alleges several specific accessibility barriers on the mobile app, including form fields improperly announcing as generic 'text field' or 'secure text field' instead of their actual labels, buttons with incorrect audio announcements like 'Tab 3 of 5' instead of functional descriptions, small touch targets, and poor contrast. Additionally, error messages on forms are visually displayed but not announced or given keyboard focus, and various app buttons lack proper roles, rendering them inaccessible to screen readers.

This legal action underscores the imperative for all businesses, especially those in the e-commerce sector providing mobile applications, to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III requirements and WCAG 2.1 A guidelines. Companies failing to provide auxiliary aids and services for effective communication risk similar litigation, potential permanent injunctions, and significant legal costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this fast-food chain's mobile application accused of?

The mobile app is accused of having form fields that incorrectly announce as generic text fields, buttons with incorrect audio announcements for screen readers, small touch targets, poor contrast, and error messages that are visually displayed but not announced or given keyboard focus.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Aishia Petersen filed this lawsuit, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other businesses with mobile applications to face similar ADA Title III lawsuits, permanent injunctions, and significant legal costs if their digital platforms do not comply with accessibility standards like WCAG 2.1

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fast-food chain's mobil.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer