Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Home Goods Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 17, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing/Incorrect LabelsDuplicate Element IDsError Notification Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen has filed a lawsuit against an online home goods retailer in the Southern District of Florida on December 17, 2020. Ms. Petersen, represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regarding the accessibility of the retailer's mobile application.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.1 A level violations, including a lack of full integration with screen-readers like Voiceover, duplicate element IDs ("Duplicate id - the same ID is used on more than one element"), incorrect button labels (e.g., "Back button" announces "mail", "menu" instead of store list), confusing image labels ("388lookbook1image"), non-automated store location features with unlabeled map dots, and a failure to provide audio notifications for form errors ("Please enter a valid email" shows on screen but no audio announces it).

This legal action highlights the critical importance for online retailers, particularly those with integrated brick-and-mortar stores, to ensure their digital platforms, including mobile applications, are fully accessible to individuals with visual impairments, thereby avoiding potential ADA Title III litigation and ensuring equal access to goods and services for all consumers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this home goods mobile app accused of?

The mobile app is accused of not integrating with screen-readers, having duplicate element IDs, using incorrect button labels, displaying confusing image labels, featuring non-automated store location maps with unlabeled dots, and failing to provide audio notifications for form errors.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Aishia Petersen, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for online retailers, especially those with mobile apps linked to physical stores, that their digital platforms must be fully accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III to prevent similar lawsuits.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Home Goods Reta.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer