Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Mobile Furniture Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 17, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 A/AAMissing Alt Text on Product ImagesScreen Reader Navigation BarriersInaccessible Form FieldsImages of Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit against an online furniture retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on December 17, 2020. The complaint alleges that the retailer's mobile application is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The plaintiff seeks permanent injunctive relief to compel the defendant to bring its mobile application into full compliance with ADA requirements and relevant regulations.

The lawsuit specifically details several alleged WCAG violations, including banners and images lacking readable labels (no audio), the "Shop by Department" feature proving dysfunctional for blind users, duplicate prices for sale products without clear labels, missing audio cues for "Add to Cart" functionality, and images lacking accessible names or having identical descriptions. Furthermore, the mobile application's input fields, such as the zip code field, provide a full keyboard instead of a numeric-only keypad, and text informing users of sales (e.g., "50% off sale") is part of an image, rendering it inaccessible to screen reader users. Technical barriers like duplicate IDs and semantically incorrect button/element relationships were also cited.

This legal action underscores the imperative for businesses offering digital platforms, especially e-commerce mobile applications linked to physical public accommodations, to ensure their online presence strictly adheres to ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 A accessibility standards. Non-compliance exposes companies in similar industries to substantial legal repercussions, including demands for permanent injunctions, recovery of attorneys' fees, court costs, and expert fees, for failing to provide equal access and effective communication to individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this mobile furniture retailer accused of?

The mobile application is accused of having banners and images without readable labels, a dysfunctional "Shop by Department" feature for blind users, unlabeled duplicate prices for sale items, missing audio cues for "Add to Cart," images lacking accessible names, zip code input fields with incorrect keyboard types, and using images of text that screen readers cannot process.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Aishia Petersen filed this lawsuit, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for mobile application providers, especially those with an e-commerce component linked to physical stores, that they must ensure full ADA and WCAG 2.1 A compliance to avoid lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, and other costs for discriminatory practices against disabled users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Mobile Furniture Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer