Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Clothing Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 15, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Accessible LabelsInaccessible Online FormsKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff Nelson Fernandez, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., filed a lawsuit on February 15, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against an online clothing retailer. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), alleging that the defendant's website fails to provide equal access to visually disabled individuals.

The lawsuit asserts that the e-commerce website contains numerous accessibility barriers, including menu drop-down options, product prices, and size options that are not properly labeled for screen reader integration. It further alleges inaccessible site information, a lack of prompting information for online forms, and the absence of an accessibility notice, policy, committee, coordinator, user testing groups, bug fix policy, automated testing, specialized customer assistance, or a dedicated page for individuals with disabilities. The complaint claims the website does not meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA or higher, and also alleges common law trespass due to unauthorized software placement on the plaintiff's computer.

This case underscores the ongoing legal vulnerability for businesses, particularly those operating e-commerce platforms with a physical store nexus, that do not prioritize digital accessibility. Companies that fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards risk facing similar litigation, demanding not only injunctive relief to remediate access barriers but also potential compensatory damages for discrimination and, in this instance, alleged trespass. It highlights the critical need for comprehensive accessibility policies and robust digital design to ensure full and equal enjoyment for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing retailer accused of?

The online clothing retailer is accused of having menu drop-down options not labeled for screen readers, product prices not labeled for screen readers, size options not labeled for screen readers, inaccessible site information, and lacking prompting information for online forms. Additionally, the website allegedly lacks an accessibility policy, committee, coordinator, user testing, bug fix policy, automated testing, customer assistance, and a dedicated page for disabled users, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Nelson Fernandez filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case creates a legal risk for e-commerce businesses that fail to make their websites accessible to individuals with visual disabilities under ADA Title III. Such businesses face potential lawsuits seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as compensatory damages for digital accessibility barriers and alleged trespass from tracking software, underscoring the need for WCAG compliance and clear accessibility policies.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Clothing Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer