Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Hardware Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 21, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: Acacia Barros, P.A.

Missing Alt Text on Banners & CategoriesKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader Incompatibility (Voiceover)Inaccessible Form Field LabelsWCAG 2.1 A Non-Compliance

Case Summary

Aishia Petersen, a visually impaired individual, has filed a lawsuit against an e-commerce tools and supplies retailer's mobile application in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 21, 2021. Represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., the complaint alleges that the defendant's mobile application is not fully accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint specifically outlines several WCAG violations, including the lack of label audio descriptions for banners, deals, coupons, and offers on the homepage, which prevents screen reader users from accessing information about promotions. Furthermore, categories and subcategories within the "Shop by Department" section lack labels for Voiceover, making product discovery difficult. Product descriptions are inaccessible to blind users, some images have incorrect label descriptions, form fields have wrong audible labels, and close buttons on overlay screens do not work with Voiceover. Additionally, the "Cart" and "My Account" icons lack audible labels, new window screens opened upon adding items to the cart are not announced, the application is not fully accessible by keyboard only, error messages are visually displayed but not announced, and mobile app buttons lack proper roles for Voiceover.

This lawsuit highlights a significant legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce mobile applications that fail to integrate accessibility features. Such businesses could face similar ADA Title III lawsuits, incurring costs for legal fees, expert fees, and the substantial expense of remediating their digital platforms to comply with WCAG standards and federal regulations. This action underscores the necessity for all digital public accommodations to ensure their mobile applications are fully usable by individuals with visual impairments to avoid denying full and equal access to goods and services.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online hardware retailer accused of?

The mobile app is accused of lacking label audio descriptions for banners, deals, coupons, and offers; missing labels for categories and subcategories; inaccessible product descriptions; incorrect image label descriptions; wrong audible labels for form fields; non-functional close buttons on overlay screens; lack of audible labels for "Cart" and "My Account" icons; unannounced new window screens; lack of keyboard-only accessibility; unannounced error messages; and mobile app buttons lacking proper roles for screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Aishia Petersen and is represented by Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal vulnerability of businesses that operate mobile applications without ensuring full accessibility for visually impaired users, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits, costly remediation efforts, and significant legal fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Hardware Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer