ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Designer Accessories Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online designer accessories retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on January 12, 2022. The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals using screen reader software.
The lawsuit specifies numerous WCAG violations, including mislabeled home page buttons/company logos, a search button mislabeled as "scan off," a log-in button mislabeled as "account down," promotional and product images mislabeled as "link," and an item price not labeled to integrate with screen readers. Furthermore, quantity increase and decrease buttons are mislabeled, shopping cart item prices and subtotals are not labeled, the company address is inaccessible, and text throughout the website is improperly labeled, causing screen reader cursors to skip information. The complaint also highlights the absence of prompting information for online forms, a lack of an accessibility notice or policy, and a failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.
This litigation underscores the significant legal exposure for businesses operating e-commerce websites that serve as extensions of public accommodations. Such companies must ensure their digital platforms provide full and equal access to all users, including those with visual disabilities, to comply with ADA Title III and the Rehabilitation Act. Failure to conduct thorough accessibility audits and implement necessary remediations to address identified WCAG barriers can lead to costly lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and attorney's fees, emphasizing the critical need for proactive digital accessibility adherence.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online designer accessories retailer accused of?
The complaint alleges that the website has mislabeled elements such as the home page logo, search button, log-in button, promotional and product images, quantity buttons, and shopping cart details (item price and subtotal). It also states that text throughout the site is improperly labeled, the company address is inaccessible, and there's a lack of prompting information for online forms, preventing screen reader software from effectively interacting with the content.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by the law firms RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case demonstrates that online retailers face significant legal risks under ADA Title III and the Rehabilitation Act if their websites are not fully accessible to visually disabled individuals. Businesses must ensure their digital platforms comply with WCAG standards to avoid lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees, highlighting the need for comprehensive accessibility audits and proactive remediation of identified barriers.