ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Upscale Specialty Restaurant and Bar
Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC
Case Summary
WINDY LUCIUS has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an upscale specialty restaurant and bar in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on January 31, 2022. The plaintiff, who is legally blind and uses JAWS Screen Reader software, alleges that the restaurant's website is not fully accessible to individuals with visual impairments.
The complaint specifically alleges multiple WCAG 2.1 guideline violations, including Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) due to an unlabeled map graphic, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) regarding inaccessible PDF menus, Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text) because pop-up announcements are not heard by screen readers, and Guideline 2.4.4 (Link Purpose in Context) as search and social media icons are unlabeled. Additionally, the lawsuit cites Guideline 3.3.1 (Error Identification), Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions), Guideline 3.3.3 (Error Suggestion), and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) for issues with form fields, error messages, and unlabeled buttons that render critical functionality inaccessible.
This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses, particularly restaurants and hospitality venues, that operate public-facing websites without ensuring full accessibility for disabled users. Companies failing to provide auxiliary aids and services, such as screen reader compatibility, may face similar injunctive relief actions, attorney's fees, and litigation costs, underscoring the importance of proactive WCAG 2.1 AA compliance to prevent discriminatory barriers.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this upscale specialty restaurant and bar accused of?
The lawsuit alleges violations of WCAG 2.1 Guidelines 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content), 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships), 1.4.5 (Images of Text), 2.4.4 (Link Purpose in Context), 3.3.1 (Error Identification), 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions), 3.3.3 (Error Suggestion), and 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value).
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
WINDY LUCIUS filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.
What legal risk does this create?
This creates a legal risk for similar businesses whose websites are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief, and significant legal costs.