Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Upscale Restaurant

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 25, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAScreen Reader Incompatibility (VoiceOver)Information and Relationships (Guideline 1.3.1)Focus Order (Guideline 2.4.3)Form Field Labeling (Guideline 3.3.2)

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an upscale Cuban/American/French cuisine restaurant in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on April 25, 2022.

The complaint alleges numerous WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations impacting screen reader users. These include failures in information and relationships, such as a reservation widget's popup button not being correctly announced as a read-only text field (Guideline 1.3.1), and issues with meaningful sequence where form popups are not announced (Guideline 1.3.2). Further allegations detail focus order problems in date pickers (Guideline 2.4.3), lack of error identification in forms (Guideline 3.3.1), unlabeled chevron buttons in widgets (Guideline 3.3.2), and name, role, value inconsistencies where the main menu icon is not announced (Guideline 4.1.2).

This action highlights significant legal risks for businesses, especially those in the hospitality sector, that operate online platforms such as mobile websites and reservation systems. Failure to ensure full accessibility for visually impaired individuals, including those using screen reader software like VoiceOver, can lead to lawsuits alleging discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this upscale restaurant accused of?

The restaurant's mobile website is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines, specifically regarding Guideline 1.3.1 (Information and Relationships) due to incorrect announcements of reservation fields, Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) because form popups are not announced, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) failing in date pickers, Guideline 3.3.1 (Error Identification) by not notifying users of form errors, Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) for unlabeled buttons, and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) as main menu icons are not announced.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case illustrates the legal risk that businesses, particularly those in the hospitality industry, face when their online platforms, such as mobile websites and reservation systems, are not fully accessible to disabled users, especially those who rely on screen reader software. These businesses may face ADA Title III lawsuits for failing to provide equal access to their goods and services.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Upscale Restaurant. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer