ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Apparel Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on May 3, 2022. The complaint alleges that an online apparel retailer's website failed to provide full and equal access to disabled individuals, specifically those with visual impairments, in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The plaintiff, who is visually disabled and uses screen reader software, seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs.
The lawsuit details several specific WCAG violations experienced by the plaintiff on the e-commerce website. These include an inaccessible size guide, mislabeled sizing and color options, submenus and the main "Promo" menu inaccessible with a keyboard, inaccessible item details (name, price, description) for specific products, and unlabeled color/size options beyond the first choice. Additionally, shopping cart details (color, size, price, totals) were inaccessible, text throughout the site was improperly labeled causing the cursor to skip information, the company address in the footer was inaccessible, and the "Chat" button was mislabeled and its subsequent options (e.g., "Free Number", "hours of operation", "Send us an e-mail", "Track/Return your Order") were not integrated with the screen reader. The site also lacked prompting information for online forms and an effective accessibility statement or widget.
This federal complaint highlights significant legal risks for an online apparel retailer and similar businesses operating e-commerce websites that serve as extensions of physical public accommodations. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA can lead to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and other litigation expenses. Businesses must ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, requiring robust accessibility policies, coordinator roles, regular testing, and proper integration with screen reader software to avoid claims of discrimination and ensure equal access.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?
The allegations include an inaccessible size guide, mislabeled sizing and color options, keyboard navigation failures for menus, inaccessible product details (name, price, description) and color/size options, inaccessible shopping cart details (color, size, price, totals), improperly labeled text causing cursor skips, an inaccessible company address in the footer, and a mislabeled "Chat" button with inaccessible sub-options (e.g., "Free Number", "hours of operation", "Send us an e-mail", "Track/Return your Order"). The website also lacked prompting information for forms and an effective accessibility statement.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
This lawsuit was filed by NELSON FERNANDEZ, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
What legal risk does this create?
This case underscores the legal risk for e-commerce websites that are extensions of physical public accommodations if they fail to meet ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards. Such non-compliance can result in lawsuits seeking costly injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and other litigation expenses for discriminatory practices against visually disabled individuals.