Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an upscale restaurant

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed May 16, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 Level A and AAMissing Alt TextUnlabeled Links/GraphicsMissing Form Labels/InstructionsScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

James Watson has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an upscale restaurant in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 16, 2022. The complaint alleges that the defendant's mobile website is not fully accessible and independently usable by visually impaired consumers, thereby denying equal access to its services.

The lawsuit specifically details several WCAG violations, including Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) as the 'MENU' label is not announced, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to an improperly labeled 'WhatsApp' graphic link announced as "send link," and Guideline 2.4.4 (Link purpose) with unlabeled social media links announced as "Marionmiam heading level 5 link." Furthermore, Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) is violated because the main menu icon is announced as "an end banner," and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) is violated with an inaccessible 'Floor Plan PDF' and generic announcements like "image" or random numbers for many elements when using a screen reader.

This litigation highlights the significant legal risks faced by businesses, particularly in the hospitality sector, whose digital platforms, including mobile websites, fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines. Similar entities offering online services must ensure full accessibility for disabled users to avoid potential lawsuits, legal fees, and reputational damage, even when using third-party vendor platforms for services like reservations.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this upscale restaurant accused of?

The mobile website is accused of violating WCAG Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) because the 'MENU' label is not announced, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to an improperly labeled 'WhatsApp' graphic link, Guideline 2.4.4 (Link purpose) for having unlabeled social media links, Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) because the main menu icon is announced as "an end banner," and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) with an inaccessible 'Floor Plan PDF' and generic announcements for many elements.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

James Watson filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case creates a legal risk for other businesses, especially those in the hospitality industry, that operate mobile websites. They could face similar ADA Title III lawsuits if their digital platforms do not meet WCAG accessibility standards, leading to potential injunctions, attorney's fees, and litigation costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an upscale restaurant. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer