Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online home furnishings retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 2, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAMislabeled ButtonsScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Text AlternativesInaccessible FormsLack of Accessibility Statement

Case Summary

Plaintiff Victor Ariza, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit against an online home furnishings retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 2, 2022. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website fails to provide equal access for visually disabled individuals, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act.

The lawsuit details multiple accessibility barriers on the defendant's website. These include mislabeled homepage buttons and company logos, telephone numbers and emails at the header lacking proper descriptions, and mislabeled compare, search, and social media buttons as "link." Further issues cited are a shopping cart mislabeled as "zero," multiple buttons mislabeled as "link" while browsing, inaccessible product image details, and mislabeled quantity increase/decrease buttons. Additionally, the item price and subtotal in the shopping cart are inaccessible, the company address in the footer is inaccessible, and the website lacks an accessibility notice or policy, explicitly failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher web accessibility standards.

This complaint highlights significant legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce platforms, particularly those in the online retail sector, if their websites are not compliant with ADA and WCAG standards. The case underscores the necessity for comprehensive digital accessibility to ensure all users, including those with visual disabilities, can effectively navigate, access information, and complete transactions on online platforms. Companies must proactively audit and remediate their websites to prevent such litigation and ensure inclusive digital experiences.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online home goods store accused of?

The online home goods store is accused of having mislabeled homepage buttons, company logos, compare, search, and social media buttons. Its shopping cart is mislabeled, product image details are inaccessible, and quantity adjustment buttons are improperly labeled. Additionally, item prices and the company address are inaccessible, and the website lacks an accessibility policy, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Victor Ariza filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case creates legal risk for online retailers whose websites do not comply with ADA and WCAG standards, potentially leading to lawsuits for discrimination against disabled individuals due to inaccessible digital platforms.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online home furnishing.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer