ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online cosmetics retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff Aishia Petersen, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., filed a lawsuit against an online cosmetics retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 6, 2022. The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website is not fully and equally accessible to visually impaired consumers, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The lawsuit specifies several critical Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations. These include "Duplicate id" where the same label is used on multiple products and images, preventing proper price announcements. The "Find a Store" feature allegedly skips location addresses and vocalizes generic terms like "detail" and "phone." Furthermore, banners are reported to lack proper alt-text descriptions, announcing as "blank," and the checkout process is inaccessible because the "Checkout Bag" notification and subsequent buttons are not announced or discoverable by screen-reading software.
This legal action underscores the significant risk faced by all online retailers and digital service providers if their websites fail to adhere to ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 standards. Businesses that do not ensure their digital platforms are fully and independently usable by disabled individuals, particularly those relying on screen-reading technology, are vulnerable to similar lawsuits seeking permanent injunctive relief, as well as demands for attorneys' fees and litigation costs.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online cosmetics retailer accused of?
The online cosmetics retailer is accused of having duplicate IDs for products and images, unannounced prices, a "Find a Store" feature that skips addresses and only announces "detail" and "phone," banners lacking alt-text descriptions, and an inaccessible checkout process where the "Checkout Bag" and checkout buttons are not announced.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Aishia Petersen, a visually-impaired and legally blind person, filed this lawsuit. She is represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case creates a legal risk for other online retailers whose websites are not fully accessible to disabled users. It demonstrates that businesses failing to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 standards can face lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, and costs due to barriers for visually impaired individuals.