Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 15, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

Mislabeled UI ElementsKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityLack of Accessibility Policy

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online women's apparel and accessories retailer in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on June 15, 2022. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website contains numerous accessibility barriers, preventing blind and visually disabled individuals from full and equal access, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The alleged WCAG violations include mislabeled home page buttons, company logos, shipping/country buttons, search buttons, wishlist buttons, and shopping cart elements. Submenus were inaccessible when navigating with a keyboard, and promotional images lacked proper descriptions. Product name prices and size options were not labeled for screen reader integration, and shopping cart details (item price, subtotal, shipping, sales tax, and estimated total) were inaccessible. Additionally, text throughout the website was unlabeled, causing the screen reader to misinterpret content and skip information, and the site lacked an accessibility notice or policy.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks faced by businesses whose digital platforms are not compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Retailers, especially those with e-commerce operations connected to physical stores, must ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities to avoid potential lawsuits for discrimination and ensure equal access to goods and services.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this fashion retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of mislabeled UI elements (buttons, logos), inaccessible submenus for keyboard users, missing descriptions for promotional images, product prices and size options not integrating with screen readers, and inaccessible shopping cart details. The website also lacked proper text labeling and an accessibility policy.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the legal risk to businesses, particularly online retailers, of being sued under ADA Title III if their websites are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, requiring them to make significant modifications to ensure compliance.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a fashion retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer