ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Apparel Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online apparel, accessories, and shoes retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 24, 2022. The complaint alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible to blind and visually disabled users, thereby violating federal disability rights laws.
The lawsuit details multiple accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website, including a mislabeled home page button/company logo, product prices and size options that are not labeled to integrate with screen readers, and an inaccessible product price and subtotal within the shopping cart. Further issues include a lack of confirmation after removing a product from the shopping cart, inaccessible store hours and address descriptions, a mislabeled shopping cart image, and an unlabeled notification for items added to the cart. Additionally, the abbreviation "USD" on subtotals is improperly labeled, and the site lacks necessary prompting information for visually disabled individuals to complete online forms for merchandise purchases.
This action highlights the significant legal exposure for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to provide equal access to individuals with disabilities. Similar online retailers that do not comply with web accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.0 Level AA, face potential lawsuits under ADA Title III, risking injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and court costs, underscoring the necessity of proactive digital accessibility remediation.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel, accessories, and shoes retailer accused of?
The retailer is accused of having a mislabeled home page logo, product prices and size options that don't integrate with screen readers, inaccessible shopping cart prices and subtotals, and no confirmation for product removal. Other issues include inaccessible store hours and address descriptions, a mislabeled shopping cart image, unlabeled cart notifications, improperly labeled currency abbreviations, and a lack of prompting information for online forms.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
, and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case demonstrates that online retailers with inaccessible websites face legal challenges under ADA Title III. Non-compliance with web accessibility standards can lead to demands for injunctive relief, payment of attorney's fees, and the necessity of extensive website remediation.