Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Jewelry and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 27, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureDuplicate IDs

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen, a visually-impaired individual, has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online jewelry and accessories retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 27, 2022. The complaint, filed by Acacia Barros, P.A., alleges that the e-commerce website is not fully accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, preventing equal access to its goods and services.

The lawsuit details several alleged Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations, including identical ID descriptions for multiple products, mislabeled images, and duplicate IDs on elements. Specific issues cited include inaccessible steps for reserving and picking up items, a store locator page that skips addresses to phone numbers, product prices that are not announced by screen readers, and a non-functional "skip to main content" link that traps users in the navigation menu. These barriers impede screen-reading software, denying the plaintiff the ability to effectively use the site.

This action highlights the legal exposure for businesses operating e-commerce platforms that fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Companies with inaccessible websites risk similar lawsuits, potential injunctions mandating costly accessibility modifications, and reputational damage. Proactive digital accessibility audits and remediation are crucial for such businesses to ensure their online presence is equally usable by all customers and to mitigate legal liabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online jewelry and accessories retailer accused of?

The online jewelry and accessories retailer is accused of having identical ID descriptions for multiple products, mislabeled images, duplicate IDs on elements, inaccessible "Reserve online and Pickup at store" functionality, skipped store addresses on the locator page, unannounced product prices, and a non-functional "skip to main content" link.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Aishia Petersen, represented by the law firm Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case creates a legal risk for businesses with e-commerce websites that are not accessible to visually impaired users, potentially leading to lawsuits, injunctive relief, and mandates for extensive website modifications to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Jewelry and Acc.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer