Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Online Fashion and Lifestyle Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 28, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Standard 3.3.2Labels or Instructions (Level A)Screen Reader IncompatibilityForm Field AccessibilityADA Title III Website

Case Summary

ARANTZA ESPINOZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on July 28, 2022, against an online fashion and lifestyle retailer.

The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website contains access barriers that discriminate against visually impaired users. Specifically, the lawsuit details violations of WCAG 2.1 Standard 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions (Level A), citing instances where combo boxes for state selection do not audibly read options, links for interest-free payments are not fully described, tooltip information for phone numbers in the checkout process is inaccessible, and a checkbox for joining an SMS list is not audibly described to screen reader users.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies operating online stores must implement comprehensive accessibility measures to comply with ADA Title III and prevent potential litigation, as visually impaired plaintiffs continue to seek equal access to digital services and products.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion and lifestyle retailer accused of?

The lawsuit alleges violations of WCAG 2.1 Standard 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions (Level A), specifically citing issues where combo boxes for state selection, links for interest-free payments, phone number tooltips, and SMS list checkboxes are not audibly described or labeled for screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ARANTZA ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal exposure for e-commerce platforms that do not provide accessible online experiences. Businesses must ensure their websites comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards to avoid similar lawsuits, declaratory judgments, and injunctive relief, especially concerning interactive elements requiring user input.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Online Fashion and Lif.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer