Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Eyewear Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 29, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC; Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAStandard 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions (Level A)Standard 2.4.3 Focus Order (Level A)Screen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Alejandro Espinoza has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online eyewear retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 29, 2022. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible, preventing full and equal enjoyment of its services.

The complaint specifically cites violations of WCAG 2.1 AA standards, including a lack of labels or instructions for user input on the checkout page (Standard 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions, Level A). Additionally, the website's focusable components do not receive focus in an order that preserves meaning and operability, making navigation difficult for screen reader users (Standard 2.4.3 Focus Order, Level A), particularly on product pages and when interacting with features like the size guide.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies operating online stores must review their websites for compliance with WCAG standards to avoid similar litigation, potential injunctive relief, and compensatory damages under federal accessibility laws.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online eyewear retailer accused of?

The online eyewear retailer is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 AA standards by failing to provide labels or instructions for user input, specifically within the country/region combo box on the checkout page (Standard 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions, Level A). Additionally, focusable components on product pages do not receive focus in an order that preserves meaning and operability (Standard 2.4.3 Focus Order, Level A), hindering navigation for screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Alejandro Espinoza filed this lawsuit. The plaintiff is represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the legal exposure e-commerce companies face if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled users. It underscores the necessity for online retailers to proactively audit and remediate their digital platforms to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines, preventing potential lawsuits, injunctions, and financial liabilities related to discrimination claims.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Eyewear Retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer